|
Click here for a PDF version of this report
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
1978, Vol. 12 (2), 140-142
Nonparturitional exposure to
donor placenta
and placentophagia after lateral
hypothalamic lesions in rats
MICHAEL NOONAN and MARK B. KRISTAL
State University of New York,
Buffalo, New York 14226
ABSTRACT: Previous research has
shown that parturitionally experienced rats with lateral
hypothalamic (LH) lesions that rendered them otherwise aphagic,
still ate placenta when it was delivered (pregnant subjects) or
presented (nonpregnant subjects). Subsequent studies have shown
that some virgin rats are spontaneously attracted to donor placenta,
whereas the others clearly avoid it. The present study was designed
to demonstrate that the sparing of placentophagia after LH lesions
observed in the earlier study was not due merely to the previous
ingestion of placenta, per se, or to inadvertent selection for
spontaneous placentophages. Virgin placentophages were allowed to
consume donor placenta; some were then bred. Prior to parturition
or after an equivalent time interval, LH lesions were produced
through indwelling electrodes. The next day, not only were the
animals with properly placed lesions aphagic to a cookie/milk mash,
but none ate delivered or presented placenta.
INTRODUCTION
During parturition, most
placental mammalian mothers ingest the delivered afterbirth, which
consists mainly of the placenta, amnion, and fetal fluids. This
phenomenon, placentophagia, might be considered as a maternal
behavior or as an ingestive behavior. Kristal (1973) investigated
the extent to which placentophagia was controlled by hypothalamic
mechanisms that are involved in the regulation of homeostatic
feeding, by examining the effect on placentophagia of lateral
hypothalamic (LH lesions. He found that lesions produced through
indwelling electrodes, which produced aphagia to a palatable liquid
diet, and which produced adipsia, also eliminated placentophagia in
rats giving birth for the first time, and in nonpregnant nulliparae
presented with foster placenta. Placentophagia was not eliminated,
however, in otherwise aphagic and adipsic rats that were giving
birth for the second time, or that were nonpregnant multiparae
presented with foster placenta. The conclusion drawn from that
study was that experience with placenta (acquired during a previous
parturition) prevented placentophagia from being eliminated by the
effects on ingestion of destruction of the LH.
Subsequent research on
placentophagia has shown that a proportion of virgin rats (Kristal &
Graber, 1976) and mice (Kristal & Eleftheriou, 1975; Kristal &
Williams, 1973) are strongly attracted to placenta (obtained
surgically from donors) and will eat it, whereas the rest avoid the
foster placenta, withdraw from it, and will not eat it even after
repeated presentations. Furthermore, the effect of parturitional
experience is strong, in that some virgin noneaters become
non-pregnant eaters after eating placenta during delivery (which
virtually all mother rats and mice do), so that the proportion of a
sample of nonpregnant primiparae that eat placenta is greater than
that of a sample of virgins, and the proportion of placentophages in
a sample of non-pregnant multiparae is greater than that of the
sample of primiparae (Kristal & Graber, 1976; Kristal & Williams,
1973).
At the time the Kristal (1973)
study on the effect of LH lesions on placentophagia was conducted,
the response of nonpregnant rats to placenta had not been examined
in great detail. Therefore, since the subjects had not been
pretested as virgins, the baseline attitude toward placenta of those
subjects was unknown. It was assumed that since both pregnant and
non-regnant primiparae with LH lesions showed sparing of
placentophagia, experience with placenta acquired during the
previous parturition afforded the protection. It now seems possible
that virgin placentophages, afforded the opportunity to eat foster
placenta, might also acquire sufficient experience with
placentophagia to prevent its elimination by LH lesions. If virgins
so treated still manifested placentophagia but were otherwise
aphagic and adipsic, one might conclude that parturitional
experience, per se, is not as critical as was earlier supposed, and
that either (1) placenta is extraordinarily attractive to virgin
placentophages that have experienced it, or (2) placentophages are
somehow wired differently than nonplacentophages. If placentophagia
is eliminated by LH lesions in virgin placentophages that have
ingested as much placenta as a parturient rat, one could conclude
that there is something specific about experience with placenta
acquired during delivery, as was hypothesized earlier (Kristal,
1973).
METHOD
Subjects
Twenty-four female hooded rats
(Charles River Breeding Laboratories), 4-7 months old, and weighing
250-310 g, were used. Normal estrous cyclicity was verified with
daily vaginal smears. Except when otherwise noted, food (Charles
River Rat/Mouse/Hamster Formula) and water were available ad lib.
Each rat was housed in a 24 x 19 x 18 cm wire-mesh cage. The colony
was maintained on a 14-h on/10-h-off daylight cycle, with the on
phase beginning at 6:00 a.m. (EST).
Procedure
Placentophagia pretest.
After verification of normal cyclicity, each female was given a
pretest to determine whether she was a placentophage or a non-placentophage.
Each rat, after 2 h of food deprivation and 15 min of water
deprivation, was presented with one donor placenta in an untipable
glass dish. Donor placenta was obtained surgically from CO2-killed
on Day 21 of pregnancy. The placentas were then frozen, along with
a few drops of normal saline, at -20șC, and stored until needed. At
that time, the placentas were rapidly thawed and warmed to about
35șC, and presented to the subjects. The subject was given a 15-min
exposure to the dish of placenta. This procedure was repeated on 3
consecutive days, or until the rat ate the placenta. Placentophages
are most likely to eat placenta on the first exposure; rats that
have not eaten by the end of the third exposure are not likely to
eat placenta at all (Kristal & Graber, 1976). Only rats determined
to be placentophages in the pretest were used in the present study.
Surgery. Two to 3 weeks
after the pretest, each rat underwent stereotaxic implantation of
chronic LH electrodes, under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia (Diabutal;
4 mg/100g body weight, IP), preceded by an injection of atropine
sulfate (.08 mg/100 g body weight, IP). A pair of Epoxylite-insulated,
.012-in. stainless steel electrodes (with the tips clipped off) was
inserted into the leveled head (Kristal, 1973) according to the
following coordinates: 2.5 mm posterior to bregma, ± 1.8 mm lateral
to the midline sinus, and 9.0 mm down from the surface of the
skull. Four No. 0-80, 1/8-in stainless steel screws were used as
anchors for the acrylic dental cement used to fasten the electrodes
in place. The scalp was sutured around the dental cement and
crystalline sulfathiozole was sprinkled on the incision.
Procedure. Each rat was
allowed 1 week of recovery from surgery before the vaginal smearing
procedure was resumed. When the rat was again determined to be
cycling normally, she was fed five donor placentas presented all at
once under conditions similar to the pretest. All of the rats ate
all five placentas. Each rat was then randomly assigned to one of
the three groups: Sham (nonlesioned-nonpregnant),
lesioned-nonpregnant, or lesioned-pregnant.
Approximately 1 week after
ingesting the five placentas, each rat in the pregnant groups was
time bred. The day on which a sperm plug or sperm in the vaginal
smear was detected was considered Day 1 of pregnancy. On Day 19 of
pregnancy, or after an equivalent time interval, each rat was
presented with about 2.5 ml of a highly palatable mash consisting of
crushed chocolate chip cookies mixed with evaporated milk. The mash
was presented in small, untipable glass dishes. All subjects ate
all of the mash within 1 or 2 min.
At noon 3 days later (on Day 22
of pregnancy, for the pregnant rats), each rat in the lesion groups
was anesthetized lightly with ether, and 2.0 mA dc were passed
between each indwelling LH electrode and a rectal cathode for 10
sec. Non-lesioned animals received the same treatment throughout
the experiment, except that at this point, no current was passed
through the electrodes. Afterwards, each rat was placed in a 45 x
19 x 25 cm plastic cage containing three paper towels; the lid
contained a food hopper and a water bottle, the contents of which
had been measured.
At noon the next day (all the
pregnant subjects having given birth) the parturient rats were
observed for maternal behavior and for the presence of placenta, and
all subjects were presented for 15 min with a dish containing five
donor placentas to test for placentophagia, and presented for 15 min
with a dish of cookie mash to test for aphagia. After testing was
completed, each rat was anesthetized and perfused with normal saline
followed by 10% formalin. The brains were then removed, fixed in
formalin, cut at 30 ” on a freezing microtome, and stained with
cresyl violet.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Each experimental subject was
classified as having adequate LH lesions both by showing aphagia to
the cookie mash and by histological verification of the lesions,
which was performed in ignorance of the behavioral results. There
was perfect agreement between the behavioral and histological
decisions. Rats that were determined not to have adequate LH
lesions were placed in a lesion-control group. All but one of the
aphagic rats was also adipsic. A diagrammatic summary of the lesion
damage in the experimental rats is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Diagrammatic
representation of the rat brain through the hypothalamus (Pellegrino
& Cushman, 1967), showing the area of minimum damage (black) and the
area of maximum damage (hatched) of the rats with LH lesions.
Table 1
Number of Subjects Eating Placenta
and Cookie Mash After
LH Lesions, Non-LH Lesions, or a
Sham Procedure,
per Number of Animals Tested
| Substance Eaten |
Sham |
L-C |
L-NP |
L-P |
| Placenta |
8/8 |
7/7 |
0/4 |
0/5 |
| Cookie Mash
|
8/8 |
7/7 |
0/4 |
0/5 |
Note: L-C = lesion-control,
L-NP - = lesion-nonpregnant, L-P = lesion-pregnant.
In regard to placentophagia, the
number of rats that ate placenta that was either in a dish (nonpregnant
subjects) or delivered normally (pregnant subjects) is presented in
Table 1. except for one rat who ate only half of the total number
of delivered placentas, the lesioned rats ate none of the delivered
or presented placentas. When the data from the lesioned animals
were compared with those of the nonlesioned and lesion-control
animals, for placentophagia and for aphagia to cookie mash, the
resulting Fisher exact-probability tests indicated that for each, p
< .0001.
Clearly, in contrast to the
effect of acquiring experience with placenta during parturition
(Kristal, 1973), acquiring experience with placenta as a virgin by
ingesting donor placenta presented in a dish does not prevent
placentophagia from being eliminated by LH lesions. Therefore, it
is not merely previous experience with a litter of placentas, nor is
it the attractiveness of an attractive nonnovel substance, nor is it
the possibility that in the previous study the experimental group
was chosen from the proportion of females that are now known to be
spontaneous placentophages, that accounts for the persistence of
placentophagia in parturitionally experienced females with LH
lesions.
REFERENCES
Kristal,
M. B. Effects of lateral hypothalamic lesions on
placentophagia in virgin, primiparous, and multiparous rats.
Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973, 84,
53-62.
Kristal,
M. B., & Eleftheriou, B. E. Placentophagia in non-pregnant
nulliparous mice: A genetic investigation. Behavioral Biology,
1975, 13, 113-119.
Kristal,
M. B., & Graber, G. C. Placentophagia in nonpregnant rats:
Influence of estrous cycle stage and birthplace. Physiology &
Behavior, 1976, 17, 599-605.
Kristal, M. B., & Williams, C. L.
The effects of strain, reproductive
condition, and strain of placenta-donor, on placentophagia in
nonpregnant mice. Physiological Psychology, 1973, 1,
354-356.
PELLEGRINO, L. J., & CUSHMAN, A. J.
A stereotaxic atlas of the rat brain. New York:
Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
(Received for publication May 5,
1978.)
This research was supported by
NSF Grant BNS76-04316, awarded to Mark B. Kristal. Reprints may be
obtained from Mark B. Kristal, Department of Psychology, State
University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14226.
|